In 1799, children’s author and educator Hannah More reacted against the revolutions that had recently taken place in America and France in terms that tell us a great deal about the child’s place in British society at that time. Denouncing Thomas Paine’s radical insistence that all men are created equal, More argued that recognizing the “rights of man” was an absurd idea. Next, she scoffed, reformers would begin to discuss the rights of women, and then (even more ridiculously) “our enlighteners […] will
illuminate the world with grave
descants on the rights of youth, the rights of children, the rights of
babies” (Walvin 45). The idea that children have rights that the state
should protect may have seemed silly at dawn of the nineteenth century,
but by the time Queen Victoria died in 1901, it had gained significant
support. Beginning in the 1830s, the Victorians passed a variety of laws
aimed at protecting the wellbeing of children at work, at school, or in
the home.This activism was motivated in part by a growing acceptance of
the Romantic idea that children are innocent creatures who should be
shielded from the adult world and allowed to enjoy their childhood.Marah Gubar, University of Pittsburgh
0 comments:
Post a Comment